<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Best For Film - Film reviews and movie news &#187; Matt Lucas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bestforfilm.com/tag/matt-lucas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bestforfilm.com</link>
	<description>Film reviews, DVD reviews and the latest movie news comin&#039; atcha like a souped-up Delorean</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Alice In Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://bestforfilm.com/film-reviews/alice-in-wonderland/</link>
		<comments>http://bestforfilm.com/film-reviews/alice-in-wonderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Hodgson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kids Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Rickman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandersnatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheshire Cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dormouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jabberwocky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knave of hearts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March Hare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Wasikowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Fry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Red Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The White Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twas brillig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweedledee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweedledum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestforfilm.com/?p=10515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After hearing so much about the weird, wonderful and utterly bizarre world Tim Burton creates in Alice In Wonderland, we entered the cinema with no small amount of excitement. Alice has had the best opening week in US history, grossing $116 million and getting rave reviews for it's gloriously inventive visuals. There's no denying that visually, Alice is a treat. But despite the exuberant effects, the story is more than lacking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After hearing so much about the weird, wonderful and utterly bizarre world Tim Burton creates in <em>Alice In Wonderland</em>, its impossible to enter the cinema without feeling extreme anticipation. <em>Alice</em> has had the best opening week in US history, grossing $116 million and getting rave reviews for it&#8217;s gloriously inventive visuals. There&#8217;s no denying that visually, <em>Alice</em> is a treat. But despite the exuberant effects, play with perspective and 3D glory, it cannot be denied that in terms of story, <em>Alice</em> is more than lacking. We expected to fall down the rabbit hole into Lewis Carroll&#8217;s world of bizarre characters, non-sensical riddles and paradoxical quests. In actual fact, we are led through a flattened Wonderland, with Lewis&#8217;s wonderful creations treated as little more than boxes to be ticked. And we&#8217;re pretty sure than Alice didn&#8217;t have to pay £12.50 for the pleasure.</p>
<h3>Welcome To Underland</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s thirteen years since Alice first followed the time-keeping rabbit, and now, as a nineteen year old girl expected to be soon married, she regards Wonderland as little more than a strange dream she once had. However, after being proposed to by the wettest man in the world, she suddenly spies the infamous rabbit once again, and follows him into a world she&#8217;d forgotten existed. But Underland (she got it wrong the first time) is not the world it once was, as the tyrannical Red Queen has taken control. It&#8217;s up to Alice &#8211; along with The Mad Hatter, The Dormouse, The March Hare and the twins TweedleDum and Tweedledee &#8211; to overthrow the Red Queen, and place her sister The White Queen back into power. But the problem is, the Queen has the Jabberwocky onside, and only a savior can slay him. </p>
<h3>Less Than Curiouser </h3>
<p>The wonderful, maddening thing about Lewis Carroll&#8217;s novels is that he presents situations that make no sense, proposes questions with no answers, riddles that cannot be resolved. He opens up the idea of logic, sense and story with his wonderful paradoxes, confusing poor Alice almost to madness. Instead of using this basis of Wonderland, Burton &#8211; or perhaps more specifically writer Linda Woolverton &#8211; decides to do the exact opposite. This is a Wonderland of answers. At the very beginning of her adventure, Alice is presented with a scroll that prophesizes her return, stating that she will slay the jabberwocky. So there you go, Burton seems to say, job done. The riddles have been taken out, the confusion is gone and all that is left is a flat, dull quest with an inevitable conclusion. And Johnny Depp wears contact lenses. So, you know, that&#8217;s good.</p>
<h3>Alice-by-numbers</h3>
<p>The characters are predictable and fairly joyless &#8211; with the exception of the Cheshire Cat, where kudos has to got to the design team for truly amazing CGI. Helena BC is good, but not as good as you think she&#8217;s going to be, and Alice herself has the personality of a playing card. And not one of the ones attacking. Her constant monotone rabbiting of &#8220;but this is all a dream&#8221; only serves to make you want to bash her in the face for her stupidity, and it&#8217;s only through a lot of very convenient plot holes (&#8220;do you happen to have&#8230;&#8221; &#8220;Yes I do!&#8221;) that her story gets pushed to its supremely obvious conclusion.</p>
<h3> Riddle Me This</h3>
<p>Throughout the film, Depp keeps asking one of the hatter&#8217;s most famous riddles, &#8220;Why is a raven like a writing desk?&#8221; In the novels, of course poor Alice is never given an answer. In this film however, Alice dully asks him outright, &#8220;Hatter, why <em>is </em> a raven like a writing desk?&#8221; He grins meekly, and states &#8220;I have no idea&#8221;.  Carroll knew that the power of Wonderland lay in its maddening mysteries, not in underwhelming answers. Our message to the <em>Alice</em> team would be this; leave Carroll&#8217;s questions hanging. They looked better where they were. </p>
<h3> Were you underwhelmed by Underland or was your journey down the rabbit hole a magical one? Let us know below</h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bestforfilm.com/film-reviews/alice-in-wonderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://bestforfilm.com/files/2010/03/alice-review-hero-150x150.jpg" length="10614" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alice In Pound Land &#8211; Burton On A Budget</title>
		<link>http://bestforfilm.com/film-blog/alice-in-pound-land-how-to-do-burton-on-a-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://bestforfilm.com/film-blog/alice-in-pound-land-how-to-do-burton-on-a-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Hodgson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bagpuss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot Cotton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Bonham Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerry Katona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Kemp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Chubby Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaun Williamson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Fry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Cheshire Cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mad Hatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Red Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The White Rabbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweedledee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweedledum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestforfilm.com/?p=10002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, alright, we get it, Burton&#8216;s Alice In Wonderland is so frikking exciting that we&#8217;re basically all just sat weeing ourselves around the clock in preparation. As we speak, cinema seats world-wide are being fitted with handy-wipe funnels and rehydration units just to ensure that society doesn&#8217;t go feral. It&#8217;s terrifying, it&#8217;s wonderful, it&#8217;s moist. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, alright, we get it,<strong> Burton</strong>&#8216;s <em>Alice In Wonderland</em> is so frikking exciting that we&#8217;re basically all just sat weeing ourselves around the clock in preparation. As we speak, cinema seats world-wide are being fitted with handy-wipe funnels and rehydration units just to ensure that society doesn&#8217;t go feral. It&#8217;s terrifying, it&#8217;s wonderful, it&#8217;s moist. That&#8217;s Hollywood for you. </p>
<p>But we can&#8217;t help but think that with the all-star team and special effects budget that Burton had to play with, he could have been replaced with a fire-safety video and the end result would still have been an epic block-buster (and possibly a lot safer, fire-wise.) So we put this to Team Alice, sure you can do it, but could you have done it without your massively huge amounts of stonking huge massive cash? (Yeah there&#8217;s two &#8216;massives&#8217; in there, but you know what, they could afford to pay for words twice.) We think not. </p>
<p>Luckily, here at <strong>Best For Film</strong>, we&#8217;ve devised a way in which the exact same film can be made, on a fraction of the budget. And you know what that means? Hell yes. A lot more money for those executive piss-seats we were talking about. The high life my friend. Take a look at our casting, and see if you can spot the difference. In some cases, we reckon the improvement is astonishing.</p>
<h3>Alice</h3>
<h3>Mia Wasikowska/Kerry Katona</h3>
<p><img src="http://c1005.r5.cf3.rackcdn.com/2010/03/alice-kerry.jpg" alt="alice kerry" title="alice kerry" width="430" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10011" /></p>
<p>Picture the scene- a deserted supermarket aisle. A young girl, on an innocent search for a party-pack of prawns, digs deep within an abandoned freezer. Suddenly- in she falls! A glorious descent into Wonder Iceland- a world where every night is budget-pie night, where your friends are singing D-list celebrities with  mini-quiches in their hands and darkness in their eyes. It&#8217;s the party that never ends! Ever. Dance for us. Dance, you shiny gathering of the damned. You wanted a dark fairytale. It doesn&#8217;t get much darker than that. </p>
<h3>The Mad Hatter</h3>
<h3>Johnny Depp/Roy Chubby Brown</h3>
<p><img src="http://c1005.r5.cf3.rackcdn.com/2010/03/roychubby.jpg" alt="roychubby" title="roychubby" width="430" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10004" /></p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s be honest here. Sure <strong>Johnny Depp</strong> is good at all that so called &#8220;acting&#8221;, but how is he at being horrifyingly racist, sexist and unexpectedly violent? Exactly. Ever tried to hold a pint when you&#8217;ve got scissors for hands, Johnny? We thought not. Too busy with your &#8220;actor&#8217;s intentions&#8221; and your &#8220;cheekbone-enhancing exercises&#8221;. <strong>Chubby Brown</strong> would put the &#8216;mad&#8217; back into the &#8216;mad hatter&#8217;, as well as the &#8216;brilliantly offensive&#8217; back into &#8216;tea party&#8217;.     </p>
<h3>The Red Queen</h3>
<h3>Helena Bonham Carter/Dot Cotton</h3>
<p><img src="http://c1005.r5.cf3.rackcdn.com/2010/03/dot-cotton.jpg" alt="dot cotton" title="dot cotton" width="430" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10015" /></p>
<p>Now here is an example of how expensive CGI is often completely unneccesary. Which face has been electronically mutated? We&#8217;re not even sure they know. Sure, Dot might not be much of a super-villain, and she&#8217;ll get you your shirts back as clean as a whistle, but would you want to live in a world where the Cotton stares up at you from every pound note? No. No you wouldn&#8217;t. Helena can be really really married to Tim Burton all she likes, but at the end of the day, Dot would bring her years (and years, and years and years and years) of being a mad old trout to the role. And there&#8217;s no substitute for experience. </p>
<h3> Tweedledee and Tweedledum</h3>
<h3>Matt Lucas and Matt Lucas/Ross Kemp and Shaun Williamson</h3>
<p><img src="http://c1005.r5.cf3.rackcdn.com/2010/03/matt-lucas.jpg" alt="matt lucas" title="matt lucas" width="430" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10029" /></p>
<p>Yet again, think of the millions in CGI that could have been saved if only Hollywood had known what we know. Sure, there are a couple of minute differences between Ross and Shaun, but you know what you do? Keep em moving! It&#8217;s an entirely new character trait! Tweedledee and Tweedledum, two boys who bop the days and nights away, a continuous jostling motion, meaning you never quite get a proper look at their ever-blurred physique. Forget 3D, this technique will bring the world of film-making to its knees. Keep leaping Shaun. Keep that beat going. </p>
<h3> The White Rabbit</h3>
<h3>Michael Sheen And Some Computers Somewhere/Sweep</h3>
<p><img src="http://c1005.r5.cf3.rackcdn.com/2010/03/sweep.jpg" alt="sweep" title="sweep" width="430" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10035" /><br />
Sometimes &#8211; and this is a lesson that <strong>Tim Burton</strong>, bless him, has yet to learn &#8211; less is more. Yes, sure, you could communicate the horrors of a panicked society by having the voice of <strong>Michael Sheen</strong> yabbering at you, holding a massive clock and parroting &#8220;I&#8217;m late! I&#8217;m late!&#8221;, or you could have the baleful, eternity-filled silent stare of Sweep. Looking into your very soul. Reminding you of all you&#8217;ve never done, and all you will never do. Sweep &#8211; I think we&#8217;ll all agree &#8211; is due an Oscar. This could be his time. </p>
<h3> The Cheshire Cat</h3>
<h3>Stephen Fry And Some CGI Bullshit/Bagpuss</h3>
<p><img src="http://c1005.r5.cf3.rackcdn.com/2010/03/bagpuss.jpg" alt="bagpuss" title="bagpuss" width="430" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10033" /><br />
You know why? Because in the world that we have created; where young Kerry is chased by massive packets of half-price figs, where the mad-hatter unexpectedly shits on the doormouse and tries to have sex with the March Hare, where the Queen chain-smokes her kingdom into a sudsy Daz-based oblivion, twins won&#8217;t stop dancing and the only silence to be found is in the horrifying stare of the rabbit/dog that is supposed to guide you, you need a bit of calm. Bagpuss. Your gravelly tones will save us all. </p>
<h3> A Wonderland you&#8217;d like to visit? Let us know below, and if you have any more suggestions, add them to the pack&#8230; </h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bestforfilm.com/film-blog/alice-in-pound-land-how-to-do-burton-on-a-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://bestforfilm.com/files/2010/03/roychubby-150x150.jpg" length="10116" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  bestforfilm.com/tag/matt-lucas/feed/ ) in 0.30079 seconds, on May 24th, 2012 at 10:01 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2012 at 11:01 pm UTC -->
