Travellers
Travellers
Travellers, a low budget horror thriller, charts the adventures of four ‘city boys’ as they head off to the woods for some rural adventures. Imagine your office team bonding weekend; usually some ill-advised rafting trip where you get to watch your boss try to contain his flesh in a wetsuit. Now imagine if you had a token idiot who defaced a traveller’s caravan with the charming phrase ‘pikey scum’, rousing the murderous anger of some gypsies and leading to a long chase through the woods, and a boxing match in a shed.
The first and most obvious problem with Travellers is the budget. It feels as though Charley Boorman (he of Ewan McGregor and motorcycle fame) swindled them out of all their money in his (terrible) cameo, and the film makers were forced to shoot the rest of the scenes on someone’s camera phone. There’s lots of hilarious slow-mo running through water – like Baywatch, but with considerably less attractive people, and any chase scenes are Blair Witch Project-wobbly. More important than the budget, however – not everyone has Hollywood money – is the plot. Though protagonist Chris (Sweeney) is sympathetic to the travellers, trying to explain their plight as one of them slices his arm open, ultimately the film is really quite offensive to those from a gypsy background. A graffiti-ed caravan, we are led to believe, is reason enough for murder, and there is never a real feeling of why a prank has such horrible ramifications.
Travellers is described on IMDB (by director Kris Mcmanus himself) as: “a modern plunge back into the worlds created by movies such as Deliverance.” That’s reaching quite a bit, but the film does have some genuinely tense moments. Unfortunately, they’re let down by a really weird and offensive plot, laughable dialogue, and a budget tighter than Russell Brand’s trousers.


Just watched this – Yes the dialogue isn’t great at times, the performances are mixed and it is incredibly low budget.
However the action was very good and the concept interesting. I don’t think naming some films and TV that the film reminds you of necessarily means the movie copied them? Fight Club – Not even close and I’m pretty sure Big Fat Gypsy weddings is far to recent to have effected a film shot at least a year before its release.
Spoiler: Also I don’t remember anyone being murdered by the travellers (I think thats the point) until the very end, the over the top city boy (Hoodie) Andy gets finished of by the Traveller Fighter after he kills the guys sister and friends, which probably is fair enough. I was routing for the Gypsies! They certainly came across better than in their recent TV coverage.
If you like home-grown, brit indies I’d check this out but be warned, boy is it low budget!
Yeah I kinda agree with Callum – I dont understand how Georgina Lavers the lady who reviewed this movie thinks it has a pop at travellers because it does NOt!!! If she’s offended by the plot she should ask herself whether she actually understood the movie or even watched the whole thing. It’s nowt like Fight Club – Georgina’s obviously not used to working out what a movie’s actually about. I don’t care if a reveiwer hates or likes a film but what grates is complete ignorance and stupidity which is what she exhibits by getting the whole thing completely wrong – my ‘traveller’ mates quite like this film which really puts her comments on the ‘let’s start a fire’ pile. Also, gotta say this was filmed in 2009 on IMDB before Big Gypsy Weddings, references to Mega Shark and Octopus simply bewildering. The only prejudice engendered against Travellers is by laughing girl Georgina who should probably go back to children’s books or simple animations which aren’t too taxing on the old grey cells…
I give your review zero out of ten, Georgina. Sorry love, you need a brain transplant!